Solutions
Turn agent activity into evidence a regulator will accept.
Governance moved from a policy document to a board-level control in a single year. Orcher produces the artifact that governance actually requires: a hashed record, per action, naming the human whose authority was exercised and the verification that cleared it.
The problem
The Orcher approach
Every enterprise running agents can produce logs. Almost none can produce evidence. A log says a request was made and a response was returned. An auditor, a regulator, or opposing counsel is asking a different question: who authorized this specific action, under what role, on the basis of which verified facts, and can you prove the record has not been altered since.
That gap is not a tooling shortfall. It is structural. Authorization was never captured as a first-class object, so it has to be reconstructed afterwards by correlating identity logs, application logs, and model telemetry that were never designed to agree with each other. Reconstruction projects are expensive, slow, and — when the evidence matters most — inconclusive.
Orcher captures authorization before execution rather than inferring it afterwards. The directive is signed by a named professional, bound to their role, verified against systems of record, and hashed into an append-only ledger together with the action it produced.
The output is a Verified Execution Cycle: a single record that answers the authorization question completely, per action, without correlation. Evidence packages are exported scoped by regime, period, role, or system — the same underlying record satisfies an internal audit, a supervisory enquiry, and a litigation hold.
The instinctive control is a human approval step. The evidence says it does not work at scale. Unaided professional accuracy on these decisions sits around 82%; in the presence of confidently wrong AI advice it falls to 45.5%. Approval gates that present hundreds of plausible actions under time pressure manufacture rubber-stamping and call it oversight.
Orcher moves the control from review to verification. The Logic Scrubber re-derives the facts an action depends on from the systems of record, in a separate process boundary, and halts anything that does not reconcile. Humans keep the authority; they stop being the throughput bottleneck and the liability sink.
Rollout
One workflow, proven end to end, before anything scales.
01
Pick one governed workflow
A single high-consequence workflow with a clear system of record and a named professional who owns the outcome.
02
Model the directive and role
Define the directive shape and map the role's real authority — limits, populations, jurisdictions — against your identity provider.
03
Wire verification
Connect the Logic Scrubber to the systems of record that hold the facts the action depends on, and set the halt semantics.
04
Prove the evidence package
Run the workflow, then export the evidence package and put it in front of the audit function before scaling to the next one.
What you get
Per-action authorization evidence
Every committed action carries its directive, role, and verification result in one hashed record.
No reconstruction projects
Evidence is exported from the ledger rather than assembled from correlated log stores.
Defensible halts
Actions that do not reconcile are recorded as halts with structured reasons, which is itself evidence of a working control.
Questions
Most often bought for
Derived from the Orcher components this solution engages.
Proof
38%
of enterprises can name an owner for agent decisions
from 7% — Vol. I, p.2
6 days
to map a new requirement to controls, versus 11 weeks
Vol. I, p.29
8–12%
of AI budget now spent on governance
from 3–5% — Vol. I, p.23
Components engaged
Briefings walk one of your real workflows through the seven components end to end.
Case studies
Modelled reference scenarios with the measurement window, the components enforced and the numbers attached. Each one downloads as a PDF.
Healthcare
Prior-authorisation and utilisation-review agents were producing decisions nobody could attribute. Ninety days later every action carried a hashed record naming the clinician whose authority was exercised.
Life Sciences & Pharma
Verification against the source data caught 214 proposed statements that the trial record did not support — before any of them were filed.
Legal Services
When a client asked what the firm had instructed the system to do, the answer was a hashed directive with a partner's name on it.
